It concerns fundamental questions about existence, origin, responsibility, free will, etcetera.
Questions about "Epilogue of the Author".
Did you notice the parallel, mentioned by the Author in his first sentence,
before you started to read this last chapter?
The Writer did not tell much about himself to the characters of the book. Do
you think that the book would have become much more complicated if he had
done so?
Do you think that the Writer could have told more about himself without
crossing the border the Author refers to?
Do you think that the book already crossed that border?
The Author says he omitted dealing with some questions. What kind of
questions do you think of when reading the following paragraphs?
Do you have any idea what would happen if the Author would make himself
known to the Writer and the characters of his book?
Do you know a book in which, according to the Author, a step is skipped?
Did you think about the question of the Author, when you read such a book?
The Author says that he is not the Writer. Looking at the signature of the
Epilogue, do you think that Fred. Zwarts (see cover) is the Author?
So, what is the answer to the question of the Author whether it is also
possible to draw the line in the opposite direction?
Do you understand what the Author means when he says that some questions
cannot be answered with only the information from our experiences, but that
information is needed from the Creator given in a different way?
If you have remarks, send them with the following form.